Hydrogen influence on transformation of terrigenous reservoir physical and mechanical properties
Abstract view|43|times PDF download|21|times
Abstract
The article aims to describe a methodology for studying the dynamic, stress-strain properties and density of core samples before and after exposure to hydrogen. The Stages of sample studies and the instruments used in laboratory experiments are examined on the example of core samples taken from the Bobrikov formations in the Volga-Ural oil and-gas bearing region. A comparative analysis of dynamic properties, density, Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio was carried out before and after ex-posure to hydrogen. It was discovered that after exposure to this gas, interval transit time of acoustic P-wave and S-wave through the samples decreased by an average of 2.4%; Young’s modulus increased by 6.5%, while Poisson’s ratio remained virtually unchanged. Besides, the research results demonstrat-ed an increase in sample density by 1.1%. The analysis of correlation dependencies revealed a typical change in interrelation of the parameters of P-wave interval transit time with Young’s modulus and S-wave interval transit time after samples exposure to hydrogen. Overall, based upon the results of the studies of density, dynamic properties, and Young’s modulus, there is evidence of weakening of the stress strain properties in the core samples. However, such change does not have a major effect on their absolute values. Analysis of the results collected during laboratory experiments shows that the consid-ered horizon could potentially be the formation for the storage of a methane-hydrogen mixture.
Document Type: Original article
Cited as: Popov, S. N., Chernyshov, S. E., Wang, X., Hou, L. Hydrogen influence on transformation of terrigenous reservoir physical and mechanical properties. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2024, 13(3): 193-202. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.09.05
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abramova, O. P., Filippova, D. S. Geobiological features of storage of hydrogen-methane mixtures in underground reservoirs. SOCAR Proceedings, 2021, S2: 66-74. (in Russian)
Abukova, L. A., Abramova, O. P. Prediction of hydrogeochem ical effects in clayey cap rock during underground storage of hydrogen with methane. Georesursy, 2021, 23(1): 118 126. (in Russian)
Abukova L. A., Nazina T. N., Popov S. N., et al. Storage of hydrogen with methane in underground reservoirs: Forecast of associated processes. SOCAR Proceeding, 2023, S2: 29-41. (in Russian)
Agyekum, E. B., Nutakor, C., Agwa, A. M., et al. A criti cal review of renewable hydrogen production methods: Factors affecting their scale-up its role in future energy generation. Membranes, 2022, 12(2): 173.
Cai, L., Bai., G., Gao, X., et al. Experimental investigation on the hydrogen embrittlement characteristics and mech anism of natural gas-hydrogen transportation pipeline steels. Material Research Express, 2022, 9(4): 046512.
Ebigbo, A., Gregory, S. P. The relevance of microbial pro cesses in geo-energy. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2021, 5(1): 5-7.
El-Shafie, M., Kambara, S., Hauakawa, Y. Hydrogen produc tion technologies overview. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 2019, 7: 107-154.
Fedoseev, S. V., Tcvetkov, P. S. Key factors of public per ception of carbon dioxide capture and storage projects. Journal of Mining Institute, 2019, 237: 361-368.
Flesch, S., Pudlo, D., Albrecht, D., et al. Hydrogen under ground storage-petrographic and petrophysical variations in reservoir sandstones from laboratory experiments un der simulated reservoir conditions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(45): 20822-20835.
Garaishin, A. S., Ruban, G. N. The basic criteria of a choice of layer-accumulator for a burial place of industrial drains of the Karashurskoe UGS. Georesursy, 2010, 4(36): 26-29. (in Russian)
Guo, Z., Gao, X., Wu, H., et al. Failure patterns in layered gas-storage systems. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2024, 12(3): 183-193.
Hafsi, Z., Mishra, M., Elaoud, S. Hydrogen embrittlement of steel pipelines during transients. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2018, 13: 210-217.
Heinemann, N., Alcaldeb, J., Miocic, J. M., et al. Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media-the scien tific challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(2): 853-864.
Hematpur, H., Abdollahi, R., Rostami, S., et al. Review of underground hydrogen storage: Concepts and challenges. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2023, 7(2): 111-131.
Kashnikov Y. A., Ashikhmin S. G., Gladyshev S.V., et al. Geomechanical and geodynamic problems accompanying the mining of hydrocarbon deposits. Journal of Mining Institute, 2010, 188: 153-157.
(in Russian) Koshevarov, P. A. Karashurskoye UGS-reserve complex in Udmurtia. Gas Industry, 2004, 3: 20-21.
Li, J., Shi, X., Yang, C. Repair of irregularly shaped salt cavern gas storage by re-leaching under gas blanket. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 45: 848-859.
Li, S., Baeyens, J., King, Q., et al. Hydrogen production: State of technology. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 544(1): 012011.
Litvinenko, V. S., Tsvetkov, P. S., Dvoinikov, M. V., et al. Barriers to the implementation of hydrogen initiatives in the context of global energy sustainable development. Journal of Mining Institute, 2020, 244(4): 428-438.
Lur’e, M. V. Gas cavity formation regime of an underground hydrogen storage reservoir in an aquifer. Territoriya NEFTEGAZ, 2021, 5-6: 86-91. (in Russian).
Mahdi, D. S., Al-Khdheeawi, E. A., Yuan, Y., et al. Hydro gen underground storage efficiency in a heterogeneous sandstone reservoir. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2021, 5(4): 437-443.
Martin, M. L., Connolly, M. J., DelRio, F. W., et al. Hydrogen embrittlement in ferritic steels. Applied Physics Reviews, 2020, 7(4): 041301.
Nazina, T. N., Tourova, T. P., Babich T. L., et al. Diversity and possible activity of microorganisms in underground gas storage aquifers. Microbiology, 2021, 90(5): 621-631.
Pettersen, O. Compaction, permeability, and fluid flow in brent-type reservoirs under depletion and pressure blow down. The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal, 2010, 3: 1-13.
Pfeiffer, W., Beyer, C., Bauer, S. Hydrogen storage in a heterogeneous sandstone formation: Dimensioning and induced hydraulic effects. Petroleum Geosciences, 2017, 23(3): 315-326.
Pfeiffer, W., Hagrey, S. F., Kohn, D., et al. Porous media hydrogen storage at a synthetic, heterogeneous field site: Numerical simulation of storage operation and geophysi cal monitoring. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75: 1177.
Popov, S N., Chernyshov, S. E., Abukova, L.A. Laboratory studies of transformation of porosity and permeability and chemical composition of terrigenous reservoir rocks at exposure to hydrogen (using the example of the Bobrikov formations in the oil field in the northeast of the Volga-Ural oil and gas province). Journal of Mining Institute, 2023, in press.
Popov, S. N., Zaripov, R. S., Parshukov, A. V. Changes in the physical and mechanical properties of rocks of the Achimov deposits of the Urengoy group of deposits depending on porosity. Gazovaya Promyshlennost, 2013, 8: 45-47 (in Russian).
Shadravan, A., Amani, M. Impacts of hydrogen embrittlement on oil and gas wells: Theories behind premature failures. Paper SPE 198588 Presented at the SPE Gas & Oil Technology Showcase and Conference, Dubai, UAE, 21 23 October, 2019.
Shevchuk, S., Kvyatkovskaya, S., Shevchuk, R. Improving geodynamic monitoring practice in underground gas stor age areas. Paper 01006 Presented at the 1st International Scientific Conference “Problems in Geomechanics of Highly Compressed Rock and Rock Massifs”, Russia Iceland, Vladivostok, 15-22 July, 2019.
Tarhan, C., C¸il, M. A. A Study on hydrogen, the clean energy of the future: Hydrogen storage methods. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 40: 102676.
To, T., Chang, C. Comparison of different permeability models for production-induced compaction in sandstone reser voir. The Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019, 29(4): 367-381.
Trautmann, A., Mori, G., Oberndorfer, M., et al. Hydrogen uptake and embrittlement of carbon steels in various environments. Materials, 2020, 13(16): 3604.
Vorobiev, S. V., Senderov, S. M., Edelev, A. V. Problem of appearance of excess gas in the Russian gas transportation network at short-time violations in Russian gas exports and the ways of solution. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Energy, 2017, 2: 151-164. (in Russian)
Wan J., Meng T., Li J., et al. Energy storage salt cavern con struction and evaluation technology. Advances in Geo Energy Research, 2023, 3(9): 141-145.
Wei, B., Wang, B., Li, X., et al. CO2 storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs: A review. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2023, 9(2): 76-93.
Yekta, A. E., Pichavanta, M., Audigane, P. Evaluation of geochemical reactivity of hydrogen in sand-stone: Ap plication to geological storage. Applied Geochemistry, 2018, 95: 182-194.
Zhang, L., Chen, L., Hu, R., et al. Subsurface multiphase reactive flow in geologic CO2 storage: Key impact fac tors and characterization approaches. Advances in Geo Energy Research, 2022, 6(3): 179-180.
Zhukov, V. S., Kuzmin, Y. O. Experimental evaluation of compressibility coefficients for fractures and intergran ular pores of an oil and gas reservoir. Journal of Mining Institute, 2021, 251(5): 658-666.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.09.05
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.