Unsteady-state CO2 foam injection for increasing enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage potential
Abstract view|104|times PDF download|50|times
Abstract
The efficiency of CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage is limited by severe viscosity and density differences between CO2 and reservoir fluids and reservoir heterogeneity. In-situ generation of CO2 foam can improve the mobility ratio to increase oil displacement and CO2 storage capacity in geological formations. The aim of this work was to investigate the ability of CO2 foam to increase oil production and associated CO2 storage potential, compared to other CO2 injection methods, in experiments that deploy field-scale injection strategies. Additionally, the effect of oil on CO2 foam generation and stability was investigated. Three different injection strategies were implemented in the CO2 enhanced oil recovery and associated CO2 storage experiments: pure CO2 injection, water-alternating-gas and surfactant-alternating-gas. Foam generation during surfactantalternating-gas experiments showed reduced CO2 mobility compared to water-alternatinggas and pure CO2 injections indicated by the increase in apparent viscosity. CO2 foam increased oil recovery by 50% compared to pure CO2 injection and 25% compared to water-alternating-gas. In addition, CO2 storage capacity increased from 12% during pure CO2 injection up to 70% during surfactant-alternating-gas injections. Experiments performed at high oil saturations revealed a delay in foam generation until a critical oil saturation of 30% was reached. Oil/water emulsions in addition to CO2 foam generation contributed to CO2 mobility reduction resulting in increased CO2 storage capacity with foam.
Cited as: Sæle, A., Graue, A., Alcorn, Z. P. Unsteady-state CO2 foam injection for increasing enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage potential. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2022, 6(6): 472-481. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2022.06.04
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbaszadeh, M., Nia Korrani, A. K., Lopez-Salinas, J. L., et al. Experimentally-based empirical foam modeling. Paper SPE 169888 Presented at SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 12-16 April, 2014.
Alcorn, Z. P., Føyen, T., Gauteplass, J., et al. Pore-and core-scale insights of nanoparticle-stabilized foam for CO2-enhanced oil recovery. Nanomaterials, 2020, 10(10): 1917.
Alcorn, Z. P., Føyen, T., Zhang, L., et al. CO2 foam field pilot design and initial results. Paper SPE 200450 Presented at SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Virtual, 31 August-4 September, 2020.
Alcorn, Z. P., Fredriksen, S. B., Sharma, M., et al. An integrated carbon-dioxide-foam enhanced-oil-recovery pilot program with combined carbon capture, utilization, and storage in an onshore texas heterogeneous carbonate field. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2019, 22(4): 1449-1466.
Alvarez, J. M., Rivas, H. J., Rossen, W. R. Unified model for steady-state foam behavior at high and low foam qualities. SPE Journal, 2001, 6(3): 325-333.
Amirmoshiri, M., Zeng, Y., Chen, Z., et al. Probing the effect of oil type and saturation on foam flow in porous media: Core-flooding and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(11): 11177-11189.
Benali, B., Føyen, T. L., Alcorn, Z. P., et al. Pore-scale bubble population dynamics of CO2-foam at reservoir pressure. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2022, 114: 103607.
Bjørlykke, K. Petroleum Geoscience: From Sedimentary Environments to Rock Physics. Heidelberg, German, Springer, 2010.
Chang, S.-H., Grigg, R. B. Effects of foam quality and flow rate on CO2-foam behavior at reservoir temperature and pressure. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1999, 2(3): 248-254.
Chang, S. H., Owusu, L. A., French, S. B., et al. The effect of microscopic heterogeneity on CO2-foam mobility: Part 2- mechanistic foam simulation. Paper SPE 20191 Presented at SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 22-25 April, 1990.
Chou, S. I., Vasicek, S. L., Pisio, D. L., et al. CO2 foam field trial at north ward-estes. Paper SPE 24643 Presented at 67th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Washington, D. C., 4-7 October, 1992.
Christensen, J. R., Stenby, E. H., Skauge, A. Review of wag field experience. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2001, 4(2): 97-106.
Enick, R. M., Olsen, D. K., Ammer, J., et al. Mobility and conformance control for carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) via thickeners, foams, and gels–A detailed literature review of 40 years of research. Paper SPE 154122 Presented at SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 14-18 April, 2012.
Falls, A. H., Musters, J. J., Ratulowski, J. The apparent viscosity of foams in homogeneous bead packs. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1989, 4(2): 155-164.
Farajzadeh, R., Andrianov, A., Krastev, R., et al. Foamoil interaction in porous media: Implications for foam assisted enhanced oil recovery. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2012, 183-184: 1-13.
Farajzadeh, R., Lotfollahi, M., Eftekhari, A. A., et al. Effect of permeability on implicit-texture foam model parameters and the limiting capillary pressure. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(5): 3011-3018.
Føyen, T., Brattekås, B., Fernø, M. A., et al. Increased CO2 storage capacity using CO2-foam. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 96: 103016.
Friedmann, F., Jensen, J. A. Some parameters influencing the formation and propagation of foams in porous media. Paper SPE 15087 Presented at SPE California Regional Meeting, Oakland, California, 2-4 April, 1986.
Hoefner, M. L., Evans, E. M. CO2 foam: Results from four developmental field trials. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1995, 10(4): 273-281.
Hanssen, J. E., Holt, T., & Surguchev, L. M. Foam processes: An assessment of their potential in north sea reservoirs based on a critical evaluation of current field experience. Paper SPE 27768 Paper presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 17-20 April, 1994.
Jones, S. A., Getrouw, N., Vincent-Bonnieu, S. Foam flow in a model porous medium: II. The effect of trapped gas. Soft Matter, 2018, 14(18): 3497-3503.
Jones, S. A., Laskaris, G., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., et al. Surfactant effect on foam: From core flood experiments to implicit-texture foam-model parameters. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2016, 37: 268-276.
Khatib, Z. I., Hirasaki, G. J., Falls, A. H. Effects of capillary pressure on coalescence and phase mobilities in foams flowing through porous media. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1988, 3(3): 919-926.
Kovscek, A. R., Radke, C. J. Fundamentals of foam transport in porous media, in Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry, edited by L. L. Schramm, American Chemical Society, Washington, pp. 115-163, 1994.
Lake, L. W., Johns, R. T., Rossen, W. R., et al. Fundamentals of enhanced oil recovery. Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014.
Lee, H. O., Heller, J. P. Laboratory measurements of CO2- foam mobility. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1990, 5(2): 193-197.
Lee, S., Kam, S. I. Chapter 2-Enhanced oil recovery by using CO2 foams: Fundamentals and field applications, in Enhanced Oil Recovery Field Case Studies, edited by J. J. Sheng, Gulf Professional Publishing, Boston, pp. 23-61, 2013.
Mannhardt, K., Novosad, J. J., Schramm, L. L. Foam/oil interations at reservoir conditions. Paper SPE 39681 Presented at SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 19-22 April, 1998.
Massarweh, O., Abushaikha, A. S. A review of recent developments in CO2 mobility control in enhanced oil recovery. Petroleum, 2021.
McAuliffe, C. D. Oil-in-water emulsions and their flow properties in porous media. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1973, 25(6): 727-733.
Metz, B., Davidson, O., De Coninck, H. C., et al. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. London, United States, Cambridge University Press for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2005.
Muller, T., Lake, L. W. Theoretical study of water blocking in miscible flooding. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1991, 6(4): 445-451.
Osei-Bonsu, K., Grassia, P., Shokri, N. Effects of pore geometry on flowing foam dynamics in 3D-printed porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 2018, 124(3): 903-917.
Osterloh, W. T., Jante, M. J., Jr. Effects of gas and liquid velocity on steady-state foam flow at high temperature. Paper SPE 24179 Presented at SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 22-24 April, 1992.
Peksa, A. E., Wolf, K.-H. A. A., Zitha, P. L. J. Bentheimer sandstone revisited for experimental purposes. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 67: 701-719.
Pini, R., Krevor, S., Krause, M., et al. Capillary heterogeneity in sandstone rocks during CO2/water core-flooding experiments. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 5473-5479.
Rognmo, A. U., Horjen, H., Fernø, M. A. Nanotechnology for improved CO2 utilization in ccs: Laboratory study of CO2-foam flow and silica nanoparticle retention in porous media. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 64: 113-118.
Ross, S., McBain, J. W. Inhibition of foaming in solvents containing known foamers. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1944, 36(6): 570-573.
Rossen, W. R. Foams in enhanced oil recovery, in Foams: Theory, Measurements and Applications, edited by R. K. Prud’homme and S. A. Khan, Routledge, New York, pp. 413-464, 1996.
Schramm, L. L. Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. Washington, D. C., American Chemical Society, 1994.
Shan, D., Rossen, W. R. Optimal injection strategies for foam ior. SPE Journal, 2004, 9(2): 132-150.
Sharma, M. CO2 mobility control with foam for enhanced oil recovery and associated storage multi-scale approach for field application. Norway, University of Stavanger, 2019.
Shelton, J. L., Schneider, F. N. The effects of water injection on miscible flooding methods using hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1975, 15(3): 217-226.
Skauge, A., Aarra, M. G., Surguchev, L., et al. Foam-assisted wag: Experience from the snorre field. Paper SPE 75157 presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 13-17 April, 2002.
Song, Y.-C., Zhu, N.-J., Liu, L., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging study on the miscibility of a CO2/n-decane system. Chinese Physics Letters, 2011, 28(9): 096401.
Tadros, T. F. Basic Principles of Dispersions. Berlin/Boston, Germany, De Gruyter, 2017.
Talebian, S. H., Masoudi, R., Tan, I. M., et al. Foam assisted CO2-EOR: A review of concept, challenges, and future prospects. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2014, 120: 202-215.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2022.06.04
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.