Estimated ultimate recovery prediction of fractured horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs based on deep neural networks

Shangui Luo, Chao Ding, Hongfei Cheng, Boning Zhang, Yulong Zhao, Lingfu Liu

Abstract view|0|times       PDF download|0|times

Abstract


Accurate estimated ultimate recovery prediction of fractured horizontal wells in tight reservoirs is crucial to economic evaluation and oil field development plan formulation. Advances in artificial intelligence and big data have provided a new tool for rapid production prediction of unconventional reservoirs. In this study, the estimated ultimate recovery prediction model based on deep neural networks was established using the data of 58 horizontal wells in Mahu tight oil reservoirs. First, the estimated ultimate recovery of oil wells was calculated based on the stretched exponential production decline model and a five-region flow model. Then, the calculated estimated ultimate recovery, geological attributes, engineering parameters, and production data of each well were used to build a machine learning database. Before the model training, the number of input parameters was reduced from 14 to 9 by feature selection. The prediction accuracy of the model was improved by data normalization, the early stopping technique, and 10-fold cross validation. The optimal activation function, hidden layers, number of neurons in each layer, and learning rate of the deep neural network model were obtained through hyperparameter optimization. The average determination coefficient on the testing set was 0.73. The results indicate that compared with the traditional estimated ultimate recovery prediction methods, the established deep neural network model has the strengths of a simple procedure and low time consumption, and the deep neural network model can be easily updated to improve prediction accuracy when new well information is obtained.

Cited as: Luo, S., Ding, C., Cheng, H., Zhang, B., Zhao, Y., Liu, L. Estimated ultimate recovery prediction of fractured horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs based on deep neural networks. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2022, 6(2): 111-122. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2022.02.04


Keywords


Tight oil reservoirs, fractured horizontal wells, deep neural network, hyperparameter optimization, estimated ultimate recovery

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguilera, R. Flow units: From conventional to tight-gas to shale-gas to tight-oil to shale-oil reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2014, 17(2): 190-208.

Arlot, S., Alain, C. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys, 2010, 4: 40-79.

Arps, J. J. Analysis of decline curves. Transactions of the AIME, 1945, 160(1): 228-247.

Bansal, Y., Ertekin, T., Karpyn, Z., et al. Forecasting well performance in a discontinuous tight oil reservoir using artificial neural networks. Paper SPE 164542 Presented at SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Woodlands, Texas, USA, 10-12 April, 2013.

Boogar, A. S., Gerami, S., Masihi, M. Investigation into the capability of a modern decline curve analysis for gas condensate reservoirs. Scientia Iranica, 2011, 18(3): 491-501.

Bouwmans, T., Javed, S., Sultana, M., et al. Deep neural network concepts for background subtraction: A systematic review and comparative evaluation. Neural Networks, 2019, 117: 8-66.

Broni-Bediako, E., Fuseini, N. I., Akoto, R. N. A., et al. Application of intelligent well completion in optimizing oil production from oil rim reservoirs. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2019, 3(4): 343-354.

Brown, M. L., Ozkan, E., Raghavan, R. S., et al. Practical solutions for pressure-transient responses of fractured horizontal wells in unconventional shale reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2009, 14(6): 663-676.

Cao, Q., Banerjee, R., Gupta, S., et al. Data driven production forecasting using machine learning. Paper SPE 180984 Presented at SPE Argentina Exploration & Production of Unconventional Resources Symposium, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1-3 June, 2016.

Chen, J., Huang, H., Liu, J., et al. Production predicting technology of shale gas fracturing horizontal well in Changning area based on the GA-BP neural network model. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(5): 1851-1858. (in Chinese)

Clark, A. J., Lake, L. W., Patzek, T. W. Production forecasting with logistic growth models. Paper SPE 144790 Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, 30 October-2 November, 2011.

Cui, Y., Jiang, R., Gao, Y. Blasingame decline analysis for multi-fractured horizontal well in tight gas reservoir with irregularly distributed and stress-sensitive fractures. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 88: 103830.

Dontsov, E. V., Suarez-Rivera, R. Propagation of multiple hydraulic fractures in different regimes. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2020, 128: 104270.

Duong, A. N. An unconventional rate decline approach for tight and fracture-dominated gas wells. Paper SPE 137748 Presented at Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 19-21 October, 2010.

Fetkovich, M. J. Decline curve analysis using type curves. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1980, 32(6): 1065-1077.

Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3(3): 1157-1182.

Hinton, G. E., Salakhutdinov, R. R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 2006, 313: 504-507.

Hsieh, F. S., Vega, C., Vega, L. Applying a time-dependent Darcy equation for decline analysis for wells of varying reservoir type. Paper SPE 71036 Presented at SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference, Keystone, Colorado, 21-23 May, 2001.

Hughes, J. D. Energy: A reality check on the shale revolution. Nature, 2013, 494(7437): 307-308.

Ji, B. Some understandings on the development trend in research of oil and gas reservoir engineering methods. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1774-1778. (in Chinese)

Khan, M. A., Jani, S. P., Kumar, A. S., et al. Machining parameter optimization using Adam-Gene Algorithm while turning lightweight composite using ceramic cutting tools. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, 2021, 4(2): 262-267.

Khamidullin, M., Mazo, A., Potashev, K. Numerical simulation of a one-phase steady flow towards a multistage fractured horizontal well. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics, 2017, 38(5): 818-826.

Kuang, L., Liu, H., Ren, Y., et al. Application and development trend of artificial intelligence in petroleum exploration and development. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1): 1-11.

Lee, K., Lim, J., Yoon, D., et al. Prediction of shale-gas production at duvernay formation using deep-learning algorithm. SPE Journal, 2019, 24(6): 2423-2437.

Li, G., Qin, J., Xian, C., et al. Theoretical understandings, key technologies and practices of tight conglomerate oilfield efficient development: A case study of the Mahu oilfield, Junggar Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1185-1197.

Liang, H., Zhang, L., Zhao, Y., et al. Empirical methods of decline-curve analysis for shale gas reservoirs: Review, evaluation, and application. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 83(5): 103531.

Liu, Y., Ma, X., Zhang, X., et al. A deep-learning-based prediction method of the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) of shale gas wells. Petroleum Science, 2021, 18(5): 1450-1464.

Luo, S., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., et al. Integrated simulation for hydraulic fracturing, productivity prediction, and optimization in tight conglomerate reservoirs. Energy & Fuels, 2021, 35(18): 14658-14670.

Mattar, L., Mcneil, R. The flowing gas material balance. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1998, 37(2): 52-55.

Meng, M., Chen, Z., Liao, X., et al. A well-testing method for parameter evaluation of multiple fractured horizontal wells with non-uniform fractures in shale oil reservoirs. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2020, 4(2): 187-198.

Mohaghegh, S. D. Reservoir simulation and modeling based on artificial intelligence and data mining (AI&DM). Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2011, 3(6): 697-705.

Niu, W., Lu, J., Sun, Y. Development of shale gas production prediction models based on machine learning using early data. Energy Reports, 2022, 8: 1229-1237.

Qin, J., Zhang, J., Jiang, Q., et al. Sweet spot classification evaluation of tight conglomerate reservoir in Mahu Sag and its engineering application. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 110-119. (in Chinese)

Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., et al. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2014, 15(1): 1929-1958.

Stalgorova, E., Mattar, L. Analytical model for unconventional multifractured composite systems. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2013, 16(3): 246-256.

Valko, P. P. Assigning value to stimulation in the Barnett Shale: A simultaneous analysis of 7000 plus production histories and well completion records. Paper SPE 119369 Presented at SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 19-21 January, 2009.

Wang, K., Li, H., Wang, J., et al. Predicting production and estimated ultimate recoveries for shale gas wells: A new methodology approach. Applied Energy, 2017, 206: 1416-1431.

Wang, S., Chen, Z., Chen, S. Applicability of deep neural networks on production forecasting in Bakken shale reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 179: 112-125.

Wood, D. A. Gamma-ray log derivative and volatility attributes assist facies characterization in clastic sedimentary sequences for formulaic and machine learning analysis. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2022, 6(1): 69-85.

Yavari, H., Khosravanian, R., Wood, D. A., et al. Application of mathematical and machine learning models to predict differential pressure of autonomous downhole inflow control devices. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2021, 5(4): 386-406.

Zhou, Z. Machine learning. Beijing, China, Tsinghua University Press, 2016. (in Chinese)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2022.02.04

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright ©2018. All Rights Reserved