Particle size effect on water vapor sorption measurement of organic shale: One example from Dongyuemiao Member of Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation in Jiannan Area of China

Rui Yang, Aoqi Jia, Qinhong Hu, Xiaowen Guo, Mengdi Sun

Abstract view|713|times       PDF download|253|times

Abstract


 

Shale formations generally contain a certain amount of water, and the occurrence of water can strongly affect the free gas content and gas storage capacity within shale. Although some studies have conducted water vapor adsorption tests to understand the water adsorption behavior and water-shale interactions, surprisingly the influence of grain size on water vapor sorption of shale is poorly understood. In this work, water vapor adsorption experiments on one Dongyuemiao shale from Ziliujing Formation in Jiannan Area, with different particle sizes (8-12 mesh, 20-35 mesh, 35-80 mesh, 80-200 mesh, and > 200 mesh) are conducted over a wide relative humidity (RH) range (5%-95%) using a gravimetric method. The influence of particle size on water vapor adsorption measurement is investigated and the optimal particle size is suggested for water vapor experiment. Results show that the maximum uptake of water vapor adsorption is smaller in larger particle sized sample, which is related to the variation of accessible pores. Monolayer adsorption capacity obtained from Guggenheim-Anderson-de Boer (GAB) modelling tends to increase as the particle size increases, suggesting a stronger water vapor adsorption potential. Comparative studies show that 20-35 mesh is suggested to be the optimum particle size for comparative purpose. The quantity of adsorption on the primary and secondary sites is comparable or equals at a RH range of approximately 60%-80%. When RH value is smaller than 60%, the quantity of water vapor adsorption on the primary site dominates, while adsorption uptake on the secondary site plays a dominant role when RH value is greater than 80%. When particle size increases, water vapor adsorptions on the primary sites increases slightly, while a decrease trend is observed for water vapor adsorption on secondary sites.

Cited as: Yang, R., Jia, A., Hu, Q., Guo, X., Sun, M. Particle size effect on water vapor sorption measurement of organic shale: One example from Dongyuemiao Member of Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation in Jiannan Area of China. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2020, 4(2): 207-218, doi: 10.26804/ager.2020.02.09

 


Keywords


Organic shale; particle size effect; water vapor sorption; areal hysteresis index; GAB model; Dent model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, E., M ¨uhlbaucr, W., Esper, A., et al. Effect of temperature on water sorption equilibrium of onion (Allium Cepa L). Dry. Technol. 2000, 18(9): 2117-2129.

Anderson, R.B. Modifications of the brunauer, emmett and teller equation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1946, 68(4): 686-691.

Arthur, E., Tuller, M., Moldrup, P., et al. Applicability of the Guggenheim-Anderson-Boer water vapour sorption model for estimation of soil specific surface area. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2018, 69(2): 245-255.

Barton, S.S., Evans, M.J.B., Macdonald, J.A.F. The adsorption of water vapor by porous carbon. Carbon 1991, 29(8): 1099-1105.

Cai, J., Li, C., Song, K., et al. The influence of salinity and mineral components on spontaneous imbibition in tight sandstone. Fuel 2020, 269: 117087.

Cai, J., Wei, W., Hu, X., et al. Electrical conductivity models in saturated porous media: A review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2017, 171: 419-433.

Cai, J., Yu, B. Prediction of maximum pore size of porous media based on fractal geometry. Fractals 2010, 18(4): 417-423.

Cailliez, F., Stirnemann, G., Boutin, A., et al. Does water condense in hydrophobic cavities? A molecular simulation study of hydration in heterogeneous nanopores. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112(28): 10435-10445.

Charri `ere, D., Behra, P. Water sorption on coals. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 344(2): 460-467.

Chen, J., Wang, F., Liu, H., et al. Molecular mechanism of adsorption/desorption hysteresis: Dynamics of shale gas in nanopores. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 2017, 60(1): 014611.

Chen, Y., Wei, L., Mastalerz, M., et al. The effect of analytical particle size on gas adsorption porosimetry of shale. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2015, 138: 103-112.

Chenevert, M.E. Shale alteration by water adsorption. J. Pet. Technol. 1970, 22(9): 1141-1148.

Deboer, J.H. The Dynamical Character of Adsorption. Oxford, UK, Clarendon Press, 1953.

Dent, R.W. A multilayer theory for gas sorption part I: Sorption of a single gas. Text. Res. J. 1977, 47(2): 145-152.

Do, D., Do, H. A model for water adsorption in activated carbon. Carbon 2000, 38(5): 767-773.

Duan, S., Li, G. Equilibrium and kinetics of water vapor adsorption on shale. J. Energy Res. Technol. 2018, 140(12): 122001-122010. EIA. Annual energy outlook 2018 with projections to 2050, 2018.

Feng, D., Li, X., Wang, X., et al. Water adsorption and its impact on the pore structure characteristics of shale clay. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 155(4): 126-138.

Ferrage, E., Lanson, B., Sakharov, B.A., et al. Investigation of smectite hydration properties by modeling experimental X-ray diffraction patterns: Part I. Montmorillonite hydration properties. Am. Miner. 2005, 90(8-9): 1358-1374.

Gasparik, M., Bertier, P., Gensterblum, Y., et al. Geological controls on the methane storage capacity in organic-rich shales. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 123: 34-51.

Ghanbari, E., Dehghanpour, H. The fate of fracturing water: A field and simulation study. Fuel 2016, 163(1): 282-294.

Gregg, S.J., Sing, K.S.W. Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity, Second Edition. London, UK, Academic Press, 1982.

Guggenheim, E.A. Applications of Statistical Mechanics. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 1966.

Guo, X., Qin, Z., Yang, R., et al. Comparison of pore systems of clay-rich and silica-rich gas shales in the lower Silurian Longmaxi formation from the Jiaoshiba area in the eastern Sichuan Basin, China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2019, 101(3): 265-280.

Han, H., Cao, Y., Chen, S., et al. Influence of particle size on gas-adsorption experiments of shales: An example from a Longmaxi Shale sample from the Sichuan Basin, China. Fuel 2016, 186: 750-757.

Han, H., Pang, P., Zhong, N., et al. The pore characteristics and gas potential of the Jurassic continental shales in the middle-small basins, northwest China. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 188: 106873.

Hatch, C.D., Wiese, J.S., Crane, C.C., et al. Water adsorption on clay minerals as a function of relative humidity: Application of BET and freundlich adsorption models. Langmuir 2012, 28(3): 1790-1803.

Hughes, J.D. Energy: A reality check on the shale revolution. Nature 2013, 494(7437): 307-308.

Inagaki, S., Fukushima, Y., Kuroda, K., et al. Adsorption isotherm of water vapor and its large hysteresis on highly ordered mesoporous silica. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 180(2): 623-624.

Ji, L., Zhang, T., Milliken, K.L., et al. Experimental investigation of main controls to methane adsorption in clay-rich rocks. Appl. Geochem. 2012, 27(12): 2533-2545.

Joubert, J.I., Grein, C.T., Bienstock, D. Effect of moisture on the methane capacity of American coals. Fuel 1974, 53(3): 186-191.

Kai, W., Wang, G., Ren, T., et al. Methane and CO2 sorption hysteresis on coal: A critical review. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 132: 60-80.

Kim, J.H., Lee, C.H., Kim, W.S., et al. Adsorption equilibria of water vapor on alumina, zeolite 13X, and a zeolite X/activated carbon composite. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2003, 48(1): 137-141.

Kimura, T., Yamauchi, Y. Water sorption property controlled by nanoscale pore connectivity of large-sized cage-type mesopores. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 16(9): 9307-9310.

King, G.E. Hydraulic fracturing 101: What every representative, environmentalist, regulator, reporter, investor, university researcher, neighbor and engineer should know about estimating frac risk and improving frac performance in unconventional gas and oil wells. Paper SPE 152596 Presented at SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlans, Texas, 6-8 February, 2012.

Kuila, U., Prasad, M. Specific surface area and pore-size distribution in clays and shales. Geophys. Prospect. 2013, 61(2): 341-362.

Langmuir, I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40(9): 1361-1403.

Li, J., Li, X., Wu, K., et al. Water sorption and distribution characteristics in clay and shale: Effect of surface force. Energy Fuels 2016, 30(11): 8863-8874.

Li, J., Wang, S., Lu, S., et al. Microdistribution and mobility of water in gas shale: A theoretical and experimental study. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2019a, 102: 496-507.

Li, J., Zhang, P., Lu, S., et al. Scale-dependent nature of porosity and pore size distribution in lacustrine shales: An investigation by BIB-SEM and x-ray CT methods. J. Earth Sci. 2019b, 30(4): 823-833.

Li, X., Krooss, B.M. Influence of grain size and moisture content on the high-pressure methane sorption capacity of Kimmeridge clay. Energy Fuels 2017, 31(11): 11548-11557.

Liu, B., Yang, Y., Li, J., et al. Stress sensitivity of tight reservoirs and its effect on oil saturation: A case study of Lower Cretaceous tight clastic reservoirs in the Hailar Basin, Northeast China. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 184: 106484.

Loucks, R.G., Reed, R.M., Ruppel, S.C., et al. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale. J. Sediment. Res. 2009, 79(12): 848-861.

Lyu, Q., Ranjith, P.G., Long, X., et al. A review of shale swelling by water adsorption. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 27(11): 1421-1431.

Makhanov, K., Habibi, A., Dehghanpour, H., et al. Liquid uptake of gas shales: A workflow to estimate water loss during shut-in periods after fracturing operations. J. Unconv. Oil Gas Resour. 2014, 7: 22-32.

Mastalerz, M., Hampton, L., Drobniak, A., et al. Significance of analytical particle size in low-pressure N2 and CO2 adsorption of coal and shale. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2017, 178: 122-131.

Mccutcheon, A.L., Barton, W.A., Wilson, M.A. Characteri-zation of water adsorbed on bituminous coals. Energy Fuels 2003, 17(1): 107-112.

Mooney, R.W., Keenan, A.G., Wood, L.A. Adsorption of water vapor by montmorillonite. I. Heat of desorption and application of BET theory. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74(6): 1367-1371.

Nicot, J.P., Scanlon, B.R. Water use for shale-gas production in Texas, U.S. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46(6): 3580-3586.

Puri, B.R., Murari, K., Singh, D. The sorption of water vapor by charcoal as influenced by surface oxygen complexes. J. Phys. Chem. 1961, 65(1): 37-39.

Ross, D.J.K., Bustin, R.M. The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2009, 26(6): 916-927.

Sander, M., Lu, Y., Pignatello, J.J. A thermodynamically based method to quantify true sorption hysteresis. J. Environ. Qual. 2005, 34(3): 1063-1072.

Sang, G., Liu, S., Elsworth, D. Water vapor sorption properties of Illinois shales under dynamic water vapor conditions: Experimentation and modeling. Water Resour. Res. 2019, 55(8): 7212-7228.

Serbezov, A. Adsorption equilibrium of water vapor on F-200 activated alumina. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2003, 48(2): 421-425.

Shen, W., Li, X., Cihan, A., et al. Experimental and numerical simulation of water adsorption and diffusion in shale gas reservoir rocks. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2019, 3(2): 165-174.

Shen, W., Li, X., Lu, X., et al. Experimental study and isotherm models of water vapor adsorption in shale rocks. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2018, 52(4): 484-491.

Singh, H. A critical review of water uptake by shales. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 34(8): 751-766.

Sing, K.S. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57(4): 603-619.

ˇSv ´abov ´a, M., Weishauptov ´a, Z., Pˇribyl, O. Water vapour adsorption on coal. Fuel 2011, 90(5): 1892-1899.

Tang, X., Ripepi, N., Valentine, K.A., et al. Water vapor sorption on Marcellus shale: Measurement, modeling and thermodynamic analysis. Fuel 2017, 209(12): 606-614.

Thommes, M., Kaneko, K., Neimark, A.V., et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87(9-10): 1051-1069.

Timmermann, E.O. Multilayer sorption parameters: BET or GAB values? Colloid. Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2003, 220(1): 235-260.

Tinni, A., Sondergeld, C., Rai, C. Particle size effect on porosity and specific surface area measurements of shales. Paper SCA 2014-013 Presented at International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Avignon, France, 8-11 September, 2014.

Vandecasteele, I., Mar´ı, R.I., Sala, S., et al. Impact of shale gas development on water resources: A case study in northern Poland. Environ. Manage. 2015, 55(6): 1285-1299.

Wang, L., Zhang, G., Hallais, S., et al. Swelling of shales: A multiscale experimental investigation. Energy Fuels 2017, 31(10): 10442-10451.

Yamashita, K., Endo, A., Daiguji, H. Water adsorption-desorption behavior of two-dimensional hexagonal mesoporous silica around freezing point. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117(5): 2096-2105.

Yang, R., Hao, F., He, S., et al. Experimental investigations on the geometry and connectivity of pore space in organic-rich Wufeng and Longmaxi shales. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2017, 84(6): 225-242.

Yang, R., He, S., Hu, Q., et al. Comparative investigations on wettability of typical marine, continental, and transitional shales in the middle Yangtze Platform (China). Energy Fuels 2018a, 32(12): 12187-12197.

Yang, R., He, S., Yi, J., et al. Nano-scale pore structure and fractal dimension of organic-rich Wufeng-Longmaxi shale from Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin: Investigations using FE-SEM, gas adsorption and helium pycnometry. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2016, 70(2): 27-45.

Yang, R., Hu, Q., He, S., et al. Pore structure, wettability and tracer migration in four leading shale formations in the Middle Yangtze Platform, China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2018b, 89: 415-427.

Yang, R., Hu, Q., Yi, J., et al. The effects of mineral composition, TOC content and pore structure on spontaneous imbibition in Lower Jurassic Dongyuemiao shale reservoirs. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2019, 109: 268-278.

Yang, R., Jia, A., He, S., et al. Water adsorption characteristics of organic-rich Wufeng and Longmaxi Shales, Sichuan Basin (China). J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 193: 107387.

Zhang, J., He, S., Yan, X., et al. Structural characteristics and thermal evolution of nanoporosity in shales. Journal of China University of Petroleum 2017, 41(1): 11-24. (in Chinese)

Zhang, R., Liu, S. Experimental and theoretical characterization of methane and CO2 sorption hysteresis in coals based on Langmuir desorption. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2017, 171: 49-60.

Zhou, S., Ning, Y., Wang, H., et al. Investigation of methane adsorption mechanism on Longmaxi shale by combining the micropore filling and monolayer coverage theories. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2018, 2(3): 269-281.

Zolfaghari, A., Dehghanpour, H., Holyk, J. Water sorption behaviour of gas shales: I. Role of clays. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2017a, 179(6): 130-138.

Zolfaghari, A., Dehghanpour, H., Xu, M. Water sorption behaviour of gas shales: II. Pore size distribution. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2017b, 179(6): 187-195.

Zou, J., Rezaee, R., Xie, Q., et al. Investigation of moisture effect on methane adsorption capacity of shale samples. Fuel 2018, 232: 323-332.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright ©2018. All Rights Reserved